There was a really interesting article the June issue of Fast Company Magazine titled “Hold the Interview: Why it may be wiser to hire people without meeting them”. Now, that got my attention!
The authors, Dan Heath and Chip Heath (of Made to Stick) report that interviews are “less predictive of job performance than work samples, job-knowledge tests, and peer ratings of past job performance. Even a simple intelligence test is dramatically more useful”.

So what would that mean to you, the career or job seeker?
You may be asked to “perform” on the spot. Instead of (or maybe even in addition to) simply showing off your interviewing finesse be ready for peer interviews, job-knowledge tests, and a request to show your work in a relevant and applicable manner. For instance, if you’re applying for an executive position, be ready to show your “100 Day Plan of Action”. If you’re applying for an office administration position, you may be asked to take a seat at the switch board and field a few calls in what is called a “working interview”.
Think this won’t happen to you? Don’t be so sure. With more candidates to see for every open position, more and more prospective employers are seeking to enhance the value of an interview process by using non-traditional methods of figuring out if the candidate can actually do the job.
What does this all mean? Well, I think it levels the playing field a bit for those who interview poorly. Now, such people may actually get hired because they managed to demonstrate their ability to do the job they are applying for rather than simply tell a good story.
Get yourself a mentor, a coach, and a personal advisory group. Your mentor will help show you the “way”, your coach will give you objective no-nonsense feedback and guidance, and your personal advisers will share their knowledge and expertise with you. And, remember – - your advisers can pull strings for you if necessary – after all, they want to see you succeed, too!


